MugoUrth

5 hours ago, Mʀ. Stᴇal-Yoᴜʀ-Waifᴜ said:

Beastiality is not ok

Can I just say... I never understood why it was spelled "BEST"iality instead of "BEAST"iality. Even though the former is correct, the later just makes more sense. I don't get it.

I also never really understood the appeal of vore. I mean, I don't hate people for liking it, but still.

I think Lickitung needs more love.

Even with a vore move, I'm still interested. Still, I wonder how easy it would be to remove the vore move from the coding.

By the way. I was playing Bootleg Wars earlier, and I noticed my Morege and Daphne stages are shorter than all of your stages. Would you like me to see if I could edit those stages to fit with the others?

12 minutes ago, #Ultimate Fernaum said:

In my mind Kamehameha is a Sayajin's super move.

Nice char 

It is also the name of a famous Hawaiian leader. With that in mind, this character actually does appear to be Hawaiian. ...Or is it just me?

I have to ask how big this character is. My browser isn't telling me when I try to download it like it usually does.

I can't imagine why the author would want to make him AI only.

18 hours ago, DarkWolf13 said:

I feel that joke's becoming already old... maybe it's me... jokes like that don't seem to amuse me. Maybe I don't like jokes pertaining to the new games info-wise or gameplay-wise.

I don't blame you. Honestly, I didn't even think it was funny the first time.

Do you think that unreleased legendary will be released in this game. I'm also starting to wonder about Zygarde's alt forms. Are they real, or were they just a hoax? Personally... I kind of hope they were fake, because they looked pretty ugly.

On 3/4/2016 at 2:22 AM, Captain Papyrus said:

Online is bad due to Street Fighter V's very Sonic'06-like status (will hopefully be fixed in a patch), Necalli's transformation is bad-ass, SFV's roster cannot suck if SF4's roster had El Fuerte, all new characters are still better than motherfucking El Fuerte, Akuma is overrated, Guile is DLC, Balrog is DLC, Rufus is forgetable, Sean is forgetable, Karin is much better than the piece of shit that is Sakura. Oh, and FANG is actually awesome if you know how to use him.

 

But seriously, El Fuerte is literal cancer and should have never happened.

YOU TAKE THAT BACK! >:(

Also, I thought El Fuerte was kind of fun to use, but... he really felt a bit on the racist side. I know it's just a stereotype, but El Fuerte kind of bordered on TOO stereotypical.

Oh wow, MugoUrth misses out on a darker, eviler version of an overrated legendary. Alert the media.

As for DLC, I think it's safe to say that they will add it down the road. They say they have no plans, but by now most people know better than to believe that.

Honestly, I will wait for DLC characters before buying this. Besides, I don't have a Wii U yet, and this game's going to have to wait in line, cause I got other games I want for the system. That, and there's, like, TWO Pokemon I even remotely like in this game. That's what you get for being the minority who likes big, heavy types over scrawny, flighty, can't-take-a-hit speedy types[;)] I guess. (And neither of the two I even like are the big, heavy type. I'll wait for Snorlax/Tyranitar/Aggron if they become DLC... Chances are we're getting Scizor and Greninja though, since people I know are BEGGING for those characters despite the fact that they really don't have anything to add to the current roster that isn't already in the roster.)

Kind of cool to see some of the GBA forms in this character. I'll give it a spin when I can.

Side Note: People slam the GBA game a lot, but to be honest, I don't think it's a bad game. I think its main problem is that the levels are LOOOOONG, and that there's a LOT of levels as opposed to the original which only had a few short levels. But game play wise, it's actually not too bad.

Edit: He's okay, but he doesn't seem to combo well in a lot of his forms. Also, the dragon form appears to have an infinite where he can use the Dragon Summon super and his electric field to trap the opponent into an infinite combo.

5 hours ago, Galvatron said:

Yeah we know it is but im pretty sure Lunatone and Solrock will get some sort of evolution since the name of the titles does represent these pokemon in a way. it seems to obvious in my perspective.. :-P

How? Oh, right, the name of the Pokemon games are Sun and Moon, that mean two lesser Pokemon MUST be important to the game because they're a sun and a moon. Hate to break it to ya, but I'm going to wait for proof again.

9 minutes ago, Galvatron said:

 

One thing I can say about this I know their going to be more mega-pokemon. and two of these pokemon I know for sure that are going to get one are

 

Lunatone :

  +   =   ? 

 

and Solrock:

+   =   ?

...considering the new titles Im pretty sure these pokemon going to have mega-evolutions. 

So far, that's just speculation.

11 hours ago, GarchompMatt said:

Silly Mugo, that stuff is 'too hard' for the audience Game Freak are apparently trying to target, hence why it's been absent since Gen IV and didn't return in OR/AS. Game Freak failed to realise that people don't dislike the Battle Frontier because it's 'hard', but because the A.I. blatantly cheats.

 

And yes, I did like me some Battle Arcade back in Gen IV.

The concept of a temporary power boost is not something Digimon invented. 'Mega' is arguably the most appropriate word to describe them, even if it was kinda used by Digimon prior.

Ultra Rayquaza?
Super Garchomp?

Incredible Ampharos?

Ultimate Charizard X?

None of them fit quite as well as 'Mega' does.

I'm not a huge fan of Megas, especially when they gave birth to such monstrosities as Mega Kangaskhan, Mega Gengar and Mega Rayquaza, but I am quite fond of Mega Ampharos and Mega Garchomp though, neither of which are considered 'OP' (the latter of which is actually considered inferior to its base form).

I actually like Mega Kangaskhan because I thought it was nice to FINALLY see an underrated Pokemon get a boost when the OU is dominated by Pokemon I find to be HUGELY overrated, like, I'm sorry to say this Matt, but... Garchomp. I see so many skinny Pokemon or legendaries in OU or higher, and it's kind of nice to see more stocky ones like Kangaskhan and Clefable in OU.

11 hours ago, Galvatron said:

Ah! so it seems...

 

well looks like my pokemon days are numbered time for me to retire. don't get me wrong i will still play pokemon (because I like rpg games) but only between gen 1-6. I won't go any further in the series from this point on. I also like the fact you can store pokemon in the bank from the classic gen 1 games on the virtual console 3ds according to the direct.

I also feel kind of sad when people say stuff like this. Why retire just because there's a new gen? If the games are still fun, why stop buying them?

4 hours ago, Captain Papyrus said:

I just hope that Sun & Moon will finally kiss the Mega Evolutions goodbye.

I like the Mega Evolutions.

34 minutes ago, GarchompMatt said:

So yeah, it's Gen VII.

 

This also means you'll need Bank to transfer stuff from X/Y/OR/AS over to them.

...I guess that's it.

I can't believe they're skipping Z without releasing that final legendary. All I know is that I'll probably buy this, especially if the game FINALLY brings back Battle Frontier and has a villain that's NOT a generic misanthrope stereotype.

16 minutes ago, Ricepigeon said:

She's from stay on the topic of the character itself, please

I kind of want to know, too, to be honest. Plus, we're still kind of talking about the character by asking where the source material originates from.

I'm still not convinced this is gen 7 yet. For all we know, they're just giving us two Gen 6 update games like they did in Gen 5.

2 hours ago, Galvatron said:

They might but something tells me the last 4 characters are going to be hidden/secret to unlock in the game that just my hunch... :-P

I don't see how Nintendo could be able to do that without huge leaks coming out.

I hope they reveal the last few characters soon.

21 hours ago, Galvatron said:

You might have something there Matt..

Also it looks like its going to be a Fairy/Metal type. considering it looks like a Robot-version of Diancie. :-P

 

Yeah that cool.. but I not so hype about it like I used to be which is why im going to retire and stop at gen 6 with the original game series. its been fun

 

I'll, for one, keep buying these games.

Also, I refuse to believe this is Gen 7 until I see actual proof instead of blind speculation.

56 minutes ago, GarchompMatt said:

It's like a weird cross between Diancie, Klink, Genesect and a Poké Ball.

 

The red and blue thing in its chest would still imply X and Y. I mean, if they can add new formes to Pokémon in a third title and new Megas in a remake, surely they can add a brand new Pokémon.

Is it wrong I instantly saw "Bakugan" instead of Poke Ball?

I'll wait for Smash NX. I'm still kind of POed by Bayonetta and Corrin's inclusion to be honest. I know I should get over it, but...

So... no word on a surprise character or anything?

I'm afraid to go on that site due to bandwidth issues. Did it actually confirm any new characters since Chandeleur?

18 minutes ago, Galvatron said:

Yeah it looks pretty awesome. :-)

Unfortunately it going to be Japan only for now until around this summer 2016 when we hear a a date release for US/EUR..  :-P

 

here are some gameplays (I'll put these vids in spoilers if anyone don't want to see.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

One cool thing about it so far you can play as Male or Female protagonist (like in pokemon) and you can battle along side with monsters you raised. So looks like is going to be one of those Rpgs where if your monsters grow strong then the main character grow strong as well.

So they're doing what they did with Dragon Quest? That makes me even more interested to be honest.